Monday, November 24, 2008

US officials flunk test of Amerian history, economics, civics

US officials flunk test of Amerian history, economics, civics
ISI – US elected officials scored abysmally on a test measuring their civic knowledge, with an average grade …

WASHINGTON (AFP) – US elected officials scored abysmally on a test measuring their civic knowledge, with an average grade of just 44 percent, the group that organized the exam said Thursday.

Ordinary citizens did not fare much better, scoring just 49 percent correct on the 33 exam questions compiled by the Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ISI).

"It is disturbing enough that the general public failed ISI's civic literacy test, but when you consider the even more dismal scores of elected officials, you have to be concerned," said Josiah Bunting, chairman of the National Civic Literacy Board at ISI.

"How can political leaders make informed decisions if they don't understand the American experience?" he added.

The exam questions covered American history, the workings of the US government and economics.

Among the questions asked of some 2,500 people who were randomly selected to take the test, including "self-identified elected officials," was one which asked respondents to "name two countries that were our enemies during World War II."

Sixty-nine percent of respondents correctly identified Germany and Japan. Among the incorrect answers were Britain, China, Russia, Canada, Mexico and Spain.

Forty percent of respondents, meanwhile, incorrectly believed that the US president has the power to declare war, while 54 percent correctly answered that that power rests with Congress.

Asked about the electoral college, 20 percent of elected officials incorrectly said it was established to "supervise the first televised presidential debates."

In fact, the system of choosing the US president via an indirect electoral college vote dates back some 220 years, to the US Constitution.

The question that received the fewest correct responses, just 16 percent, tested respondents' basic understanding of economic principles, asking why "free markets typically secure more economic prosperity than government's centralized planning?"

Activities that dull Americans' civic knowledge include talking on the phone and watching movies or television -- even news shows and documentaries, ISI said.

Meanwhile, civic knowledge is enhanced by discussing public affairs, taking part in civic activities and reading about current events and history, the group said.


其實美國的政府內閣同中國野一樣都好膠﹐

不過今次竟然連新內閣都...

唔知fatko會點睇呢? orz

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

世人愈來愈難以理解



其實之前已經在無線新聞中看過此報導了。
這個十三歲的英籍小女孩只有正常人一成的心臟基能﹐
一直以來也要靠着不斷的覆診及藥物來維持生命。
十三年過去﹐小女孩突然毅然決定放棄這種生活﹐而父母卻出奇地在審訊後欣然接受女兒的心願。即使這樣行女兒會只剩下半年的生命﹐他們倆也只希望女兒能走自己願走的路。

在我的眼中﹐儘管生命要那般的勉強延續下去﹐那女孩的生命是上帝給賜你的。有機會活下去者卻自動放棄生命﹐為了除去「痛苦」而放棄做人最大的恩賜﹐更遺棄家人而去。姑且不論她永遠落到地獄與否﹐她這樣做﹐是她一生中唯一一個不可原諒﹐不能挽回的錯。

很心痛為何現代人已經完全忘記了主對我們的愛。

Friday, November 14, 2008

今個月燒$

家人這陣子對我說︰「你真是家中花錢最多的一個。」無法不認同。

由從九月開始到SPACE過大專生活後﹐我漸覺自己每一秒鐘都在燃燒金錢。不是嗎? 在這裡讀書頭一個學期就已是兩萬多元﹐然後每星期四由屯門家乘車到炮台山上課時又在車費上花了很多;因為一至四都上學﹐所以四日的午飯又要外出解決;每個星期五又要到旺角學日文﹐學費又是一大筆;再加上學琴﹐開學時買的書......到了現在又已近冬季﹐才發覺自己的冬季衣物不夠﹐結果今天又花了近七百元買冬天衫! 嘩﹐就算我平日再努力減少吃喝玩樂﹐就算我完全不買我平日的精神食糧﹐我在家中生活洗費的地位也難以變改......

覺得理所當然? 當然不會。我天生不知怎地就是對多洗費存有罪惡感。覺得慚愧? 那又不是﹐我怎可能不花那些錢? 那些是必須品來耶!

我只是在想 ︰我那些每天上課下課都零食不絕﹐雜誌看不完﹐便服永遠不會重覆的新同學們﹐究竟他們的洗費會大到什麼地步? 雖然我知他們大都有做兼職。可是﹐洗費大就是大﹐我真的很想知道他們為何可以突破那種洗大錢後自責的感覺。

可能這是上帝賜予我與別人的不同之處吧。

我還真的要快找多一份補習工幫補一下。我給家的負擔還真不少了。

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

好.空.閒

我又再次踏足blogger這個網站。
今次非常有心情的重新整理好自己的blogger﹐準備用它取代xanga。
在blogger寫寫的心情應該好過在xanga的時候...

WOW﹐這陣子在SPACE中的新同學們開始不斷討論下年轉科轉學院的問題。
其實在我記憶中﹐我是班中第一位有這個念頭甚至計劃的人。由開學時我已經把今年當作給自己一個嘗試讀新科目的機會。可是兩個月過去後﹐同學令氣氛慢慢轉為「已上賊船」似的﹐不斷說出對我們這科的不滿﹐認為學院開辦這科是沒意義的。有同學更聲稱我們同科的師兄師姐都紛紛離開課程轉讀其他的科目。

為何選我們初初選讀這一科﹐但才兩月個月後同學就紛紛座這山﹐望那山呢? 我認為根本是課程的結構作怪。這個課程涉及accounting及financial information management兩個範疇﹐可是課程都不能令學生深入學習兩個範疇的知識。例如後者的Business Information System一科中﹐所教授的都只是一些十分表面的基本認識(並不算得上是學識﹐個人認為)﹐而沒有詳細學習各種系統的用法和操作原理。我自己認為這種表面式的概覽對我們日後就業沒有大的幫助。另外﹐課程
大部份時間都放了在第二個範疇上﹐而每個星期就只有星期四的那三小時會計課。我們究竟可以在每星期那三個小時中有多大的會計知識增長呢? 每一次上課﹐自己都有感課程進度像是有速度﹐有效率﹐就是沒有根基。剛剛的會計mid-term對於我來說已經是一個好好的証明。雖然說是大專生主要是靠自身的努力﹐可是這是否代表學校方面的支援可以買少見少呢?

一年後如何也好﹐我真的希望在這年找清自己的方向﹐亦希望眾新認識的同學也是如此。

......

話說回來﹐剛才下樓跑長跑又進步了﹐好開心。真的料不到自己的體能可以回復得這麼快!
另外﹐步行回家的時候﹐見到有位同道人兄跑得如步行的慢...可能各有喜好吧 orz 。

希望體重回到130lbs左右吧。

聽日GE oral presentation 。